Comments on: What’s the difference between MySpace/Facebook status updates and Twitter?

By: Epsilon Eridani

Epsilon Eridani — Tue, 08 Jun 2010 22:54:17 +0000

Yes, they ARE the same business when it comes to reputation updates – but Facebook offers more connectivity options and gear like applications and additional similar gadgets. MySpace offers a personalized profile page, applications and all like that. FB is typically more qualified, MySpace is for younger broadcast who just want to connect with friends, and Twitter is just reputation updates without all the clutter.

By: Jeffrey

Jeffrey — Tue, 08 Jun 2010 22:13:36 +0000

I’ve only used Twitter and Facebook. Facebook updates are large gear in life, which is why here isn’t very much of a character regulate. On Twitter, you can get up to 140 font per post. Twitter is for less vital gear in life. You would post gear like “I’m drinking russet” on Twitter. On Facebook, “Vacant on vacation” would be apt. I would recommend Twitter, but Facebook has much more facial advent.

By: Bonnie

Bonnie — Tue, 08 Jun 2010 22:05:18 +0000

Personally, I reflect Twitter is more simpler to use. I used to despise reputation updates on MySpace and when Facebook started using them, I felt like I was learning too much info on broadcast’s lives. I felt like a tail. lol I started to get used to it even if, and reading reputation updates are usually quite entertaining, I usually look at them more than any additional business on FB, but I just deleted my financial statement on all of the sites, because I reflect I can do surpass gear with my time. FB used to be so addicting, lol. But, I reflect it’s excellent for your shape also to keep physically off persons sites and renovate face to face communications, more private ways of communication- and less self leak. I mean social networking isnt all that terrible, but I in fact don’t want to reveal so much of myself to broadcast anymore, I’m learning alot about these gear…